제3호 | 제3호 2021_신라의 한강유역 진출과 기와의 성격

In this paper, archaeological observations of the Silla Roof-tiles excavated from the Han River basin were made to classify the types and to examine the characteristics of the recording chronologically plan by specific period. Hereby, the detailed properties of Silla Roof-tiles excavated from the central remains of the Han River basin were compared and analyzed. The Roof-tiles excavated from three representative sites were analyzed, and the Roof-tiles excavated from other sites in the Han River basin were compared and reviewed, and the concept of time and space with the Silla Roof-tiles was finally summarized. As a result, the Silla Period in the Han River basin was divided into five periods from the early 6th century to the early 10th century. The first and second periods of this paper were the mid- 6th to early 7th centuries, when Silla entered the Han River basin and laid the foundation before reunification, and the second period was the mid-7th century. Based on these periods, the Roof-tiles types that were popular in the Han River basin during the period were organized and presented in consideration of the upper and lower limits along with the period when each type was very popular. In any case, most of the remains excavated from the Han River basin correspond to the remains of the fortress, which Silla established as it established a stable foundation for governance after entering the Han River basin. Soon, Roof-tiles excavated from these ruins are active relics that can be seen as the establishment of the government office along with the implementation of Silla's military system. In comparison, dozens of Silla fortresses are located in the nation were not excavated, mostly in the form of bastions, which could be understood as field alliance systems under the control of the pre-stable government posts like Goguryeo and Baekje. In conclusion, the ancient three kingdoms shared many cultural and technological aspects through exchanges. Of course, each country developed its own culture and developed its own cultural specificity, but on the other hand, it shared cultural universality, including language. So far, it is important to identify cultural and technical elements unique to each country in archaeological research trends, but I think it is also necessary to find and distinguish cultural universal values shared by the three countries. In the process, some individual archaeological elements should be judged to have been influenced by the national or military level and should be avoided defining the nature of the remains or relics.